Service Management
Capital Planning & Project Delivery
Almost every CMMS stops at logging and scheduling. Clarisync digitises the execution of the work order itself – the right people, procedures and controls enforced in the workflow, not assumed around it. One system for planning, governance and execution, purpose-built for mission-critical environments.
The hard part of mission-critical maintenance isn't scheduling — it's making sure the right work is done by the right people, the right way, under the right controls. Clarisync brings planning, governance and execution into one system, with the asset record, competency, permits, procedures, inventory and risk controls all connected underneath.
Pick the role closest to yours. One piece of that role's real work is drawn end to end – what a traditional CMMS carries, and what happens around it today in documents, spreadsheets, email and meetings. In Clarisync, the same workflow runs governed, in one system.
Follow the asset lifecycle from register to execution. Open any stage's Demo to walk through it in the actual system.
Explore the asset register, preventive maintenance, planning, execution and inventory. Select a stage to see its objective and full capability detail.
Objective. A centralised asset register with complete visibility of asset information, ownership, location, documentation, maintenance history and lifecycle data.
Objective. Automate recurring maintenance through structured PM programmes, standardised work packages and controlled work order generation.
Objective. Plan, assign and publish work across internal teams and contractors with visibility of workload, resource availability and demand.
Objective. Manage maintenance from work request through completion with full visibility, accountability and execution history.
Objective. Maintain visibility and control of spare parts, materials, warehouses and tools to support efficient maintenance.
The reason operators choose Clarisync usually isn't a feature a competitor lacks. It's how the whole thing is built. Five principles set it apart from a traditional CMMS.
Competency, permits, isolations and SOPs are enforced inside the work — the right people, procedures and controls, in the workflow rather than around it.
We digitised the execution layer itself — from work request to close-out, with Dual Layer Validation on critical work. It is one of the few CMMSs to carry the full execution layer as a digital workflow.
The work order draws on people, risk, cost and change automatically, because it's part of one connected operation — not a silo you integrate after the fact.
Designed by people who've run these operations, so the depth — and the fit to how the work is actually done — is there out of the box, not bent from a generic product.
AI works across scheduling, risk and assurance — controlled, deterministic where it should be, and human-in-the-loop by design.
AI runs through Asset Management two ways: quietly in the background — automating steps inside the workflow — and as agents you can ask. Controlled, human-in-the-loop by design, and backed by AI Transparency.
Proposes the optimal maintenance schedule from asset condition, criticality and resource availability — a planner approves.
A function from your validated list — e.g. surfacing the right procedure or spare, or flagging a reliability pattern.
An agent you can ask — e.g. “what's driving reactive spend on this asset class?”
Here's the honest thing: on a standard requirements list, any serious enterprise CMMS ticks the same boxes – and so do we. Operators still choose Clarisync, and find it hard to say why in checklist terms: it's more usable, it reflects how the work is actually done, and it does things a requirements list doesn't even think to ask for.
The differentiators that don't show up on a feature-parity comparison — because most of the industry doesn't know to look for them.
Often the real comparison isn’t against one product — it’s against the stack of disconnected tools an operation runs today.
Category-level comparison against a traditional CMMS archetype. No named competitors are compared; specific claims require verification.
Asset Management doesn't work alone. Inside the Site Operations system of work, it pulls what it needs from its sibling modules — automatically.
Asset Management – the work order – sits at the centre. Four Site Operations solutions connect to it, and each one adds its own context to the work.
The work order. The one record every related solution adds its context to.
Adds to the work orderScheduling matches the right technicians to the work — by competency, certification and shift pattern — and blocks assignment where authorisations are missing.
Adds to the work orderRAMS, permits, isolations and point-of-work risk assessments are enforced before and during execution. Competency comes from Workforce & Competency; supplier competency from the vendor portal.
Adds to the work orderRounds & readings surface condition and defects into work orders; shift handover and critical-systems load context guide when work can safely run.
Adds to the work orderMaintenance and spares consumption flow into operational cost, budgets and savings tracking without re-keying.
High-risk maintenance is wrapped in Change Management; asset failures raise incidents and feed Problem Management to remove root causes — all against the same asset record.
Explore the System of Work →Asset condition, reliability and lifecycle data inform capital forecasting and replacement; delivered projects hand new assets straight back into the register.
Explore the System of Work →Powerful on its own — unmatched as part of a system. See what you unlock when Asset Management runs alongside the rest of Site Operations.
The reliability and execution gains cover the platform's cost – and in a mission-critical estate, one avoided outage can do it alone. Figures below are illustrative for a representative operator (5–10 sites, 10–30 MW each) and are validated per estate.
More preventive work scheduled and closed on the asset register – less reactive firefighting.
Recurring faults become reliability actions, not repeat call-outs and overtime.
Replace the separate CMMS, incident, risk and competency tools with one system – fewer licences, less integration.
Governed, competency-gated execution and a real preventive-maintenance regime cut unplanned failures on critical plant. In a mission-critical estate, the cost of a single significant outage – lost service, SLA penalties, emergency response – can exceed the cost of the platform for a year. Prevent one, and it has paid for itself.
Permits, competency and change enforced inside every critical work order. ~40% less downtime
It's the first CMMS that actually understands a data centre — competency and permits happen inside the work order, not around it.
Head of Critical Facilities · Operator
