Service Management
Capital Planning & Project Delivery
Most risk tools track risk after the fact, in isolation – a register here, an audit there, monitoring somewhere else. Clarisync makes governance, risk and assurance one connected control system, embedded in daily operations and tied to the assets and work that create the risk – defined, monitored and proven in one place.
Managing operational risk takes more than a register and an audit cycle. Frameworks, audits, inspections, risk assessments, incidents, permits, competencies, statutory compliance and daily monitoring usually sit in separate systems. Clarisync brings them into one control system – standards defined once, assurance embedded in the daily work, and a live evidence trail that's always audit-ready.
From governance framework to prevention, incident response and daily operational control. Open any stage's Demo to walk through it in the actual system.
Four connected stages. Select a stage to see its objective and full capability detail.
Objective. Define the standards, templates and governance controls used to manage risk, compliance, competency and operational assurance across all sites.
Objective. Embed assurance in the daily work, so gaps surface as risks and actions while there is still time to fix them.
Objective. Consolidate risk from every source into one register, and respond to incidents with clear ownership and learning.
Objective. Keep a live view of operational risk and reliability across every site, and be audit-ready at any time.
Your platform technical and QHSE teams build the standards once in Sentinel – the competency framework, audit and inspection forms, the SOP/MOP/EOP libraries, best-practice and critical-load standards. Then they assemble them into one cohesive Reliability & Risk Management Programme and publish it across the fleet, or to selected sites – where it lands in each site's operations with actions, deadlines and ownership. Platform sets the standard; sites run it – each in their own hub.
Platform sets the standard; sites run it – each in their own hub.
The reason operators choose Clarisync isn't a feature a GRC tool lacks – it's how it's built. Six principles set it apart from tracking risk after the fact.
Audits, inspections, rounds, readings and handovers are part of everyday operations – not a separate compliance exercise before an audit.
Audit, inspection and best-practice gaps create risks and actions on their own – nothing falls between a finding and a fix.
Risks consolidate from audits, inspections, incidents, compliance, people and operations – with clear owners and accountability.
Define the framework once in Sentinel and publish it as one programme across the fleet – so every site runs to the same standard, and rolls up into one risk picture.
Risk is tied to the assets, the work, the people and capital that create it – an infrastructure risk can become a capital project on its own.
AI works across programme suggestions, root-cause analysis and compliance-expiry watch – controlled and human-in-the-loop by design.
AI runs through Risk & Reliability two ways: quietly in the background – automating steps inside the workflow – and as agents you can ask. Controlled, human-in-the-loop by design, and backed by AI Transparency.
Surfaces compliance gaps and workforce-development actions across the programme, prioritised for the team.
Generates root-cause analysis from incident data to speed investigation and prevention.
Flags certifications, statutory tasks and inspections about to lapse before they do, and turns the gap into a risk-register action.
An agent you can ask – e.g. “where is our risk concentrated across the fleet this quarter?”
Today risk and reliability are scattered across spreadsheets, standalone risk logs and separate monitoring – none of them connected to the assets or the work. Here's how the pieces stack up.
Spreadsheets, risk logs and monitoring each cover a slice – none is connected to the assets or the work.
Often the real comparison isn't against one product – it's against the stack of disconnected tools an operation runs today.
Category-level comparison. This contrasts Clarisync with category archetypes (spreadsheets, risk-log tools and separate monitoring), never a named product – each judged only on what it's for. It's framed around where we add value, not to attack anyone.
Risk & Reliability sets the standards and controls the other modules run under – and consolidates their risk and evidence back into one place.
Risk & Reliability sits at the centre. Four Site Operations solutions connect to it, and each one runs under its standards.
The standards and controls. Every module runs under them – and one place holds their risk and evidence.
How it connectsPermits, isolations, RAMS and point-of-work risk assessments are enforced on critical maintenance; asset failures feed the risk register – and a reactive work order can raise a reliability alert or toolbox talk.
How it connectsThe competency framework, Level 1/2/3 qualification standards and best-practice standards are defined here in Sentinel; Workforce & Competency manages people and authorisations against them.
How it connectsDigital rounds & readings, shift handover, critical-load monitoring and reliability alerts embed assurance in daily operations and surface exceptions as risk.
How it connectsCorrective actions and remediation carry their cost impact into budgets and savings tracking.
Risk & Reliability has its own internal-only incident management; the customer-facing version lives in the Service Management System of Work and Customer Command. Operational incidents and corrective actions connect across both, and high-risk change is governed against the same controls.
Explore the System of Work →Infrastructure risks whose recommended action is a capex project automatically create projects in Capital Planning & Project Delivery – and risk, assurance and compliance extend to that delivery, so it carries the same governance as live operations.
Explore the System of Work →Powerful on its own – unmatched as part of a system. See what you unlock when Risk & Reliability runs alongside the rest of Site Operations.
Assurance in the workflow and one fleet standard cost less than the incidents and audits they prevent – and one avoided incident can cover the platform. Figures below are illustrative for a representative operator (5–10 sites, 10–30 MW each) and are validated per estate.
A live, always-audit-ready evidence trail instead of a scramble before every audit.
Build the programme once in Sentinel and publish it to the fleet – no re-inventing it site by site.
Holistic portfolio risk profiles that satisfy investors, hyperscale clients and lenders – protecting valuation and cost of capital.
Embedding assurance in the daily work and turning recurring faults into reliability actions prevents the incidents that cause downtime, claims and reputational damage. In a mission-critical estate, the fallout from a single significant incident can exceed the cost of the platform for a year – prevent one, and it has paid for itself.
Audits, inspections, incidents and compliance consolidated with clear ownership. 100% audit-ready
Assurance is part of daily operations now – not a scramble before an audit. Risk finally lives in one place.
Head of Risk & Compliance · Operator